Rex; Humanities can tell you why this might be a bad idea. This piece from the National Humanities Alliance is being circulated in a variety of relevant venues. Think pieces abound on how best to make the case for the value of studying the humanities—should we as a humanities community emphasize the quite respectable career and salary outcomes of humanities majors or do we then fall into the trap of suggesting that higher education is necessary only for economic gain? Should we make claims that extend beyond the marketplace and emphasize preparation for citizenship and living the good life or do we then ignore the real economic concerns of first generation college students and many others?
The humanities need no case The humanities need no case: This letter was written by a reader of the site; I have provided the links to posts he addresses in his remarks and include his references.
Stover would have us imagine the humanities confined to the university library and lecture hall, with their professors holding forth on the narrowest of subjects. Small wonder, then, that scientists push them aside and receive greater recognition.
These ventriloquists of the humanities may be staging their spectacle with the aim of delighting or antagonizing their readers, but they miss the central point. The staging and spectacle employ the very means they would caricature, namely the humanities.
Rhetoric, logic, and language are at the heart of the humanities, and their opponents — as well as many of their would-be advocates — secretly make use of the humanities in their speeches about its worth.
It is the language of gossip, anger, excitement, exhaustion, distraction; it is the language of lies and love. Federico Fellini in his Amarcord, his film of remembrance, traveled back to this seaside city to record this language.
Recording this language, he made a work of art. But this art is not above us, foreign to us. It is not a learned abstraction.
|Humanities - Wikipedia||The task of defending the relevancy of the humanities relies significantly upon succinctly and creatively responding to critiques made against them. This article attempts to summarize a fair number of view points critiquing the humanities, with the goal of providing a sort of partial overview of arguments that are appearing in the ongoing debate.|
|Elizabeth Blackburn - WikiVisually||Anthropology Anthropology is the holistic "science of humans", a science of the totality of human existence.|
|Her family moved to the city of Launceston when she was four, where she attended the Broadland House Church of England Girls' Grammar School later amalgamated with Launceston Church Grammar School until the age of sixteen.|
|The humanities need no case - HUMANITIES WATCH||June 22, Author: Amid all the doom and gloom of the MLA Convention, one field seems to be alive and well:|
On the contrary, its language illuminates our lives. Stover speaks for many others who would make the humanities into fragile, erudite, and airy subjects.
They are much more basic and durable. In fact, they preside over the means of their making. He argues that the humanities produce overspecialized and effete scholarship. We could try to defend this humanities hologram.
But this would be only more theater of the absurd, when the drama itself lies in the language of argument. If we look to poets and thinkers across the centuries, we discover, repeatedly, that they have criticized scholars for their narrow pursuits, and also for their quest for fame and money.
So Socrates mocked the sophists, and Lucian the philosophers. But — in case you think I am now being pedantic myself — the point is to learn from the humanities, the range and depth of its literature. By this means we might more fully understand ourselves by understanding others.
The humanities are so fundamental that critics and advocates easily overlook them, but this oversight is part of our modern malady and one-sidedness. Here Italians are more alive to the dangers of this one-sidedness, which is why Rimini will always celebrate Fellini, and Certaldo its Boccaccio, and why Roberto Benigni, the actor and comedian, can read Dante before thousands of people on the steps of Santa Croce in Florence.
Russia, too, has long explored this modern urge to isolate and limit the humanities through science and scholarship. Gogol, in his brilliant Dead Souls, has his protagonist Tchitchikov visit two estates: The first farm is a model of utility and proficiency and the second is in disarray.
Both extremes exist to the detriment of both. Stover would have the humanities push literature into scholarly insignificance. As Joseph Brodsky observed, Dostoevsky found inspiration and insight in the very syntax of the Russian language, in its use of dependent clauses, which led to the spiraling psychological digressions that wind through his work.
Can we ever stand as advocates or lawyers for the humanities? Or do they not, rather, wait upon us to become more alive to their resources? They require not a case, but care.
They remain in patient uselessness; they guard the gifts of language, which we all need though too little respect in our preoccupations with science and technology. Rabindranath Tagore a century ago contemplated the advance of the sciences in words that were pungent and prescient.
Tagore held science in esteem and met with Einstein in to discuss the nature of truth. Yet as an educator, poet, and philosopher, he warned against the single-minded mania for science as the path to fulfillment. Science, when it oversteps its limits and occupies the whole region of life, has its fascination.
It looks so powerful because of its superficiality — as does a hippopotamus which is very little else but physical. Man truly exists in the ideal of perfection, whose height and depth are not yet measured. We may ignore them as we ignore our inner lives, our need for myth and stories, even our love for flowers: Life in the round is the realm of the humanities.The humanities need no case: a response to Justin Stover and many others.
he made a work of art. But this art is not above us, foreign to us. It is not a learned abstraction. On the contrary, its language illuminates our lives. our lives follow a richer cadence. Schools and universities may have retreated from these voices, but they. Search the history of over billion web pages on the Internet.
IMPACT OF HUMANITIES RESEARCH: CASE STUDIES Interest in research impact – the contribution research makes to society – continues to grow in Denmark and abroad.
The cases presented here by the Faculty of Humanities at the University of Copenhagen illustrate how research can, in a number of ways, make important . McCarty’s emphasis on modelling, Ramsey’s emphasis on coding, the Alberta school’s emphasis on prototyping, all point to important aspects of the practice of discipline.
But none are sufficient to cover the whole range activity that most people would recognise as belonging to “The Digital Humanities.”.
In the article “A Case for the Humanities Not Made” by Stanley Fish the main points in this article is the lack of emphasis on humanities in Universities.
The direction, focus, and rush on majors that can get the student quick access to jobs in the world.
Things such as online courses and t. Micheners missionary imposed moral norms that made no sense to Hawaiians. He could not, as a he refuses to admit religious fundamentalists ()in Stanley Fishs () paraphrase, I hear you knocking, but you in any case, not an argument about the practice of Christian missions as suchPriest cannot seriously claim, as he does at.