Case 2 What is physician aid-in-dying? Physician aid-in-dying PAD refers to a practice in which a physician provides a competent, terminally ill patient with a prescription for a lethal dose of medication, upon the patient's request, which the patient intends to use to end his or her own life.
Although there are certainly several debates against this viewpoint on assisted suicide, it is not up to ethicists to make decisions that infringe upon the rights of the ill and infirm.
As it stands, there is a solid argument in favor of human euthanasia or physician assisted suicide. Furthermore, having access to physician-assisted suicide allows the patient to maintain control over his or her situation and to end life in an ethical and merciful manner.
There are multiple definitions within both the medical and legal communities about assisted suicide but in general, the most contentious debate is when a suicide is assisted by a physician as opposed to a private citizen or family member.
Even though the benefits of assisted suicide for the terminal individual are incredibly significant, the debate is not free from questions about the responsibilities of the medical community as well as those offered up by ethicists and more importantly, religious groups.
It is necessary to take a balanced view of the issue and understand each side but realize that the rights of the individual in determining the course of his or her death, especially in terminal cases where pain is a major issue. To be an assistant to the death or suicide of another human being is another issue that is removed from physician-assisted suicide.
For the purposes of this argument, the focus will be on the involvement of a medical professional in the oversight and management of a suicide or, in other words, physician-assisted, rather than simply assisted suicide. In physician-assisted suicide, a physician provides the assistance" Gupta 2.
These opponents to the argument supporting physician-assisted suicide believe that it is not within the rights of the medical field to help patients die, but to help them improve or at least continue life, no matter what its quality may be.
The main flaw in this argument is that it ignores the fact that some terminally ill patients suffer from a great deal of pain and no longer wish to have their lives artificially prolonged by expensive, painful, or debilitating treatments and would rather die quietly.
For them, it would be most beneficial for the medical community to offer some kind of permanent solution to the pain and prolonged life as they may not wish to commit suicide themselves or worse, are physically incapable of doing so.
As a result of these dueling arguments, the question of rights and responsibilities is posed, namely, what are the rights and duties of a medical professional versus those of an individual patient?
While the medical community does have the responsibility to help patients as much as possible, if there is no possibility of hope or recovery, then it should be their duty to end pain and suffering by offering the terminally ill if they have requested it, of course an end to their plight.
Connected with this idea is that every human being should have the right to decide when and in what palliative care context their life ends if they are in a situation such as this.
It should be the right of the patient to decide when he dies as well as his right to die without undue pain or more suffering. While a patient may choose to take his or her life by other means such as disconnecting tubes or artificial life support networks this might be incredibly painful and prolonged.
Instead, doctors should offer freely the possibility for an easier solution.May 20, · Physician aid-in-dying (PAD) refers to a practice in which a physician provides a competent, terminally ill patient with a prescription for a lethal dose of medication, upon the patient's request, which the patient intends to use to end his or her own life.
Need Help? Contact a suicide hotline if you need someone to talk to. If you have a friend in need of help, please encourage that person to contact a suicide hotline as well. - Worldwide In general, if you're outside the US, numbers for your country are here: Help a friend - Befrienders Worldwide.
They believe that sick people who will be dying soon because of medical conditions should not be subjected to prolonged pain and physician-assisted suicide is the ethical way to do it.
2. Patients have the right to the kind of treatment they want. Sep 26, · Study counters argument against assisted suicide. “Those who received physician-assisted dying in the jurisdictions studied appeared to enjoy comparative social, economic, educational.
The argument for, and against, euthanasia. what’s to stop the mentally ill from choosing suicide, or the recently paralyzed? You could even argue that the option of physician-assisted. Arguments In Favor Of Physician Assisted Suicide Law Medical Essay. Physician-Assisted Suicide: Is it Ethical and Moral not to?
Tiffany C. Wells. West Coast University - Ontario. Abstract. This paper explores the technical aspects of Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS) and Physician Aid-in-Dying (PAD) as well as the public policy on this topic and the personal opinion of the author.