An argument against abolishing exams in school

Education should create equal opportunities for all Statistics prove time and time again that those individuals with a private education background have more education, job and social opportunities than those who were educated by the state. The ratio of private school pupils entering the most prestigious universities is substantially high considering the fraction of children who are educated privately; to the extent where these universities have been accused of discrimination.

An argument against abolishing exams in school

Messenger In recent weeks, students across high school and university classrooms have been breathing sighs of relief. Exams are officially over, and celebrations have begun.

For many students, exams seem a necessary evil. But are exams really necessary? And are they evil? InMacquarie University was the first Australian university to debate the abolition of exams.

Big Issues

No exams in any subject, at any year level. Critics also often argue that exams promote a superficial understanding of topics, and that they are inauthentic: However, this is taking a narrow view of the benefits of exams.

Exams include many of the aspects we want from assessment.

An argument against abolishing exams in school

What do we want from assessment? Good assessment programs aim to provide a balanced, fair evaluation of each student. They achieve this in two ways. First, they use of a variety of strategies and tasks. This gives students multiple opportunities, in varying contexts, to demonstrate what they know and can do.

It also enables teachers to be confident in the accuracy of their judgements about each student.

The Case Against Grades (##) - Alfie Kohn

Assuming a subject has a number of goals knowledge to learn, skills to acquireeach task should be appropriate to the specific goal or goals it is assessing. This means that a task assessing base knowledge will look different to one assessing creativity.

Rather than abolishing exams, we should instead be asking what mix of assessment tasks is most appropriate for each subject. Where might exams fit? And what are their benefits? Exams focus on breadth In most disciplines, there are specific bodies of knowledge that students are expected to learn.

Physics students might learn about thermodynamics, while history students might learn about the cold war.

[BINGSNIPMIX-3

For example, history students might be asked to choose and research a historical character in depth. Business studies students might be asked to design the pitch for a new business seeking venture capital.

Recent Opinions

These tasks develop several important higher-order thinking skills, such as analysis and decision-making. They do different things. And this is exactly what we want: We also want fit-for-purpose.Without homework, kids could spend time with their parents and siblings talking about school, going to school functions, etc.

% of students in a survey reported having one or more physical, stress-related symptom such as headaches, stomach problems, exhaustion, and weight loss.

Are exams actually necessary?, essay by gabrielbrum

It was left to the students whether they wanted to sit for these exams or opt for the school-based exam program. In , the school-based program was made compulsory for all the students.

Without homework, kids could spend time with their parents and siblings talking about school, going to school functions, etc. % of students in a survey reported having one or more physical, stress-related symptom such as headaches, stomach problems, exhaustion, and weight loss. I think exams are a painful but important part of education. They force students to focus on a particular topic and learn it. In life, we don't have exams, just results but that's why school is so important. Arguments Against Standardized Testing Critics of standardized testing in college admissions say that standardized tests are no longer as good of an indicator of college success as once thought. The following are just a few arguments against standardized testing.

The Private Education System Should Be Abolished. The ratio of private school pupils entering the most prestigious universities is substantially high considering the fraction of children who are educated privately; to the extent where these universities have been accused of discrimination.

The Private Education System Should Be Abolished. The recent story in the WSJ that Kathleen Sullivan (law, Stanford) failed the Bar Exam raises anew whether the exam ought to be abolished.

Before discussing this issue, I must note that I found the story to be a bit sensationalistic for the WSJ, as its main purpose seemed to be to mock Kathleen Sullivan. Arguments Against Standardized Testing Critics of standardized testing in college admissions say that standardized tests are no longer as good of an indicator of college success as once thought.

The following are just a few arguments against standardized testing.

An argument against abolishing exams in school

We have the grade problem at my high school. In the same course or department, a B in one classroom might be an A, or even a C, in another. It's a problem for us, and, likely, a problem in most.

The Private Education System Should Be Abolished - DebateWise